No Thermite on 911! REALLY!

Anatomy of a Thermite Brainwashing Operation?

2011-12-18T18:44:00.001Z

We were recently advised of the publication of a new e-book on Lulu.com:

Nanomanagement: The Disintegration of a Non-Profit Corporation (SC)By Michael Armenia

Paperback: £12.92

Ships in 3–5 business days

This item has not been rated yet

The collapse of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the world’s foremost 9/11 truth group, as witnessed from its inner sanctum.

(http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/nanomanagement-the-disintegration-of-a-non-profit-corporation-%28sc%29/11773311?productTrackingContext=search_results/search_shelf/center/1)

PDF link:

http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_71/11327000/11327887/1/print/9083187_nanomanagement_complete_100713.pdf

It's quite an interesting read - and seemingly exposes the AE911 "truth" group as some kind of "brainwashing" operation. Even though the author documents how the group operates, he is either unhappy about revealing why it has been run the way it has been run, or he does not realise. I think there is an enormous clue on (PDF) page 238 of the book, where the author publishes a documenting AE911's volunteer "vetting" guidelines. This particular page is reproduced below.

Pay particular attention to the search terms suggested - which include only 1 named person (in the whole of history).

I wonder who wrote these procedures...

T. Mark Hightower's Nanothermite Challenge

2011-06-25T17:50:00.000+01:00

I received a message and a couple of documents from T Mark Hightower. He is now challenging the story about Nanothermite in relation to the destruction of the WTC. Thanks mainly to Dr Judy Wood, I have known for about 3.5 years or more that the thermite story was bogus - so my focus has shifted to showing what "DID do it", not "what didn't". However, it's encouraging to see others now challenging the bogosity of this story - which legions of people seemed to have been "trained" to repeat since 2005.

From: T Mark Hightower

Sent: 21 June 2011 16:39

To: Andrew Johnson

Subject: No entries received for The Nanothermite Challenge

Andrew,

I especially want to keep those who posted my May 1 paper on their web sites informed. The deadline of June 20 for The Nanothermite Challenge passed with not even one entry.

Mark reported that he attended a conference recently.

I was passing out copies of my paper, as well as a two page handout seeking Architects & Engineers for Nanothermite Truth and providing an update since the release of the paper. I have attached that document for your information. ... On June 12 I created a Facebook group Architects & Engineers for Nanothermite Truth in order to help get the word out about The Nanothermite Challenge. I have also attached a document that is what I posted as the Information for that group. I then posted as widely as I could on relevant Facebook walls entries like this.

Daring to question nanothermite orthodoxy Architects & Engineers for Nanothermite Truth (aeNtruth). Home of The Nanothermite Challenge Only x day(s) left for The Nanothermite Challenge, an opportunity to win a donation of up to $1000 to AE911Truth if it can be documented through peer reviewed science that nanothermite can be formulated as a high explosive as claimed by AE911Truth in April 2009. The link for the Facebook group is

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Architects-Engineers-for-Nanothermite-Truth/126368667445590

If you think any of this information is worthy of being reported on your web site, please feel free to do so in any manner that you see fit. I consider all of this in the public domain. Thank you again so much for what you did to help spread this information.

Cordially,

Mark

Documents:

aeNtruthFacebookGroup110612.pdf (40 KB) (Modified: Jun 22 2011 10:14:56 AM)
aeNtruthMissionStatement.pdf (87 KB) (Modified: Jun 22 2011 10:14:56 AM)

Also see: http://www.serendipity.li/wot/how_can_nanothermite_be_explosive.htm

Richard Gage and the "Adhominitic Method"

2011-05-14T20:43:00.002+01:00

It seems with AE911 truth having to write a "debunking" piece, which omits 90% of the evidence catalogued by Dr Judy Wood (e.g. upside down cars and weather evidence), Gage got to the end of his tether on a recent show with Ralph K Winterrowd.

In the edited clip below, although Ralph doesn't quite have chance to make his points clearly, you can clearly hear Gage accusing Wood of "practicing witchcraft" and implying she is a "nutjob" (though he doesn't actually say this).

Finally, he states she only has "2 pieces of evidence in her book" - which is rather a strange thing to say.

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/911/Richard%20Gage%20Witchcraft%20Nuutjob%20-%20Ralph%20Winterrowd%20-%2008%20May%202011.mp3

The posting of this "Hit Piece" (why am I reposting it...?!?)

http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/505-ae911truth-faq-6-whats-your-assessment-of-the-directed-energy-weapon-dew-hypothesis.html

came only a day before Dr Wood's appearance on Coast to Coast (see below).

Again, readers can make their own minds up as to what is happening here....

2011-05-12T18:47:00.000+01:00

Someone sent me this!

Andrew,

I have discovered something interesting relating to the presence of thermite in the World Trade Center dust. Here in the US, it is a common construction practice to use exothermic welds to weld copper grounding conductors to steel building columns or rebar. This process is called Cadwelding.

Thousands to tens of thousands of these welds would have been present in the buildings and a source of thermite residue. Another potential source for thermite is its storage in electrical maintenance shops where Cadweld powder and equipment are commonly kept. This would be a more prosaic explanation of where the thermite came from because of its widespread use in building construction and maintenance in the US.

Here are two links for your review.

Cad Weld - Copper Ground to Rebar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3p9Py0QO8Y

Exothermic welding

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermic_welding

Chemical Engineer - "Has nanothermite been oversold to the 9/11 Truth community?"

2011-05-03T20:33:00.000+01:00

Today, I was sent this paper by T Mark Hightower, B.S., M.S., Chemical Engineering. I hope it helps you to become "Thermite Free"....

Here is a PDF of the paper - feel free to share it!

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/NanoCompletePaper_final110501.pdf

For more information on why thermite does not explain the evidence - and why it was "set up" as a new false story, please see http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/

Also see http://tinyurl.com/911ftb for much more back ground etc. Finally, if you want to know the truth, keep looking at the evidence....

HTML posting of the paper here: - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=326&Itemid=60

Richard Gage - Gauged - Again!!

2011-04-14T00:19:00.003+01:00

Perhaps he believes his own nonsense... Well done Abe!

Richard Gage Quizzed about the Abilities of Thermite

2011-04-12T10:12:00.001+01:00

Steven E Thermite Jones and Cold Fusion

2010-11-25T08:25:00.003Z

I can't believe I hadn't already post this here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j52uWQCqQ0A

For more on how people like Steven E Jones have helped to cover up "free energy" technologies, please see these videos.

2010-09-29T18:30:00.003+01:00

More problems with thermite, Jones, Harrit and the Bentham Open Chemical/Physical Journal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyKTMnKCexs

"What did you have for breakfast?" "Thermite"

"What is your dog's name?" "Thermite"

"What's your favourite colour?" "Thermite"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dErdgy33GVA

And for those wondering "what did it, then"? See:

http://www.drjudywood.com/wtc/

and http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Video - Defusing Nanothermite: Integrity

2010-04-06T20:03:00.002+01:00

Here is a well produced video highlighting more problems with the thermite dust study

I posted this comment:

Yep - you'll get some negative comments on this excellent video from the armies of Thermite sniffers....

However, there is another story in relation to 9/11 which they likely won't mention and it is not mentioned in this video either.

What turns steel to dust? What turns cars (selectively) upside down? These things are shown in the photo and video record of the events. As is the proximity of Hurricane Erin to NYC. Hmmmm..... can you handle the truth?

911 Truth Forums - The Truth?

2010-04-04T12:08:00.003+01:00

Someone sent me this - click on the image below to see it full width.

But is this really how it is? See what you think.... http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=9707&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0

and that's almost 3 years old now!

Someone sent me this:

AE911 Truth Petition Signer - Additional Info

2010-04-04T11:44:00.001+01:00

I just received this...

Hey Andrew,

One specific thing:

They removed me from the petition simply for messaging Richard Gage, in a private email, a question about Dr. Wood. I asked Richard Gage if he had ever heard of her or her research, and if he would be willing to contact her to collaborate and help support her legal cases.

I never heard back, and was deleted from the petition.

I just wanted to clarify this, because I had not yet begun posting about Dr. Wood in the forums. It was not until after I was removed from the petition that I began posting, and THEN, after I had posted for several days and weeks, that they finally emailed me and tried to offer me a refund.

Key point: They could contact me to offer me a refund, but they couldn’t reply to my thoughtful email that was intended to help Richard Gage and AE911Truth.

Just wanted to clarify J

Thank you for posting it

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez

M1 Medical Student

B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

AE911 Truth Petition Signer - Deleted for Posting About DEW Research and Dr Judy Wood

2010-04-04T10:08:00.002+01:00

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=280&Itemid=60

A short while ago, we were contacted by a Medical Student who found out his name had been deleted from the AE911 truth supporters petition because he was posting material and comments in relation Dr Judy Wood and Steven E Jones connections into Los Alamos National Labs and the energy issue (an example can be found here: http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=145077#145077)

He asked why his name was deleted - and this was the response. I leave you to analyse it to the extent you wish. To me, it makes the reason for the existence of AE911 truth fairly clear.

From: Mark Graham [mailto:mgraham@ae911truth.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 8:45 PM
To: Abrahm@Mindoutpsyde.com
Subject: Abrahm, a message from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Abrahm,

I am writing to you on behalf of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to explain why we removed your name from our list of petition signers and to offer you a full refund of your generous donations.

We decided to remove you from our list of petition signers because, whether you knew it or not, we have chosen to carefully limit the scope of our message to the collapse of the World Trade Center and the need for a new investigation that would specifically consider the use of explosives in bringing it down. Our message is displayed on our website in the petition and mission statement. The evidence supporting our message is also found on our website, which I am sure you have seen since you signed our petition.

www.ae911truth.org

Your suggestion about contacting Judy Wood and engaging in a discussion with her about her theories about directed energy weapons and other things is a suggestion for action that is outside the scope of our message. We would lose more than we would again. If nothing else we would lose the time required to make such a contact and engage in a discussion / debate whose duration would be unknown. We are also well aware of Judy Wood and her theories. The reason we don't support her or her theories is that they are outside the scope of our message.

There is a lot of evidence besides the characteristics of controlled demolition seen in the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7 that strongly suggests or proves that the official story of 9/11 is false. As you know 9/11 is a very complicated subject. Yet Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth deliberately avoids those topics. We leave it to others to make those arguments and present the evidence to the public, to Congress, and so on.

If you will tell us the total amount of your donations to us we will refund all of your money. You mentioned that you donated over $100. What is the exact amount, if you know it? Please provide your check numbers if you have them. We do not want to leave the perception or the reality that we have taken advantage of you financially.

Will you accept our offer of a refund as a complete and equitable solution to this situation?

Take care,

Mark Graham
Volunteer Coordinator

from 911forum.org.uk:

"Lastly, I should let you know that I recently messaged Richard Gage and AE911Truth to ask him to contact Dr. Judy
Wood, and as a result, I have been removed from the Petition Signers list on AE911Truth.org, despite the fact that I have donated over $100 dollars to Richard Gage and his organization over the past several months. As of the morning of March
4th, my name was removed from the AE911Truth petition, so it appears that I have been removed from the petition simply for asking about Dr. Judy Wood. This is very concerning, because I have not done anything wrong by asking Richard Gage to talk to Dr. Judy Wood and consider her research, yet AE911Truth.org has removed me from their petition simply for asking about her once in a private email. In addition, Richard Gage has never replied to any of my emails over the past several months, not even one of them, but Dr. Judy Wood has responded to several of my emails in just the last week. Oddly enough, Dr. Wood predicted that Richard Gage and Dr. Jones would ‘blacklist’ me for mentioning her, and she was right. "

From: Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez [mailto:abrahm@mindoutpsyde.com]
Sent: 12 March 2010 03:41
To: 'Mark Graham'
Subject: RE: Abrahm, a message from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

I HAVE DONATED AND SUPPORTED YOU VIGOROUSLY, AND YOU SILENTLY REMOVE ME FROM THE PETITION SIMPLY FOR ASKING RICHARD GAGE A QUESTION IN A PRIVATE EMAIL!?! Very professional. I bet treating supporters the way you have treated me is “within” the scope of your message?

A more appropriate response would have been to send me an email back saying “Dear Supporter, sorry, but your request is outside the scope of our message.” But instead, I was SILENTLY removed from the petition.

Why am I JUST NOW being told that my request was outside of the scope of focus, AFTER I was removed from the Petition?

I am sure you can understand why I am so upset.

By the way, regardless of whether you agree with Dr. Judy Wood’s conclusions about what brought the buildings down, why did AE911Truth not support her legal efforts to bring about 9/11 Truth? Her Qui-Tam whistleblower case, filed in 2007, made it all the way to the Supreme Court, yet Richard Gage has not even filed a Qui-Tam case yet. Why is that? What is he waiting for? Why didn’t he support Dr. Wood’s case, regardless of whether he agreed on her conclusion?

Proof of her case: http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs483.snc3/26465_819259076229_14802233_46160188_7960697_n.jpg

I am extremely upset.

-Abe

Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez

M1 Medical Student

B.S. Biology / Neurobiology

"No Thermite Ahead!!"

2010-03-07T19:58:00.000Z

Say no more...

Ralph Winterrowd seems to agree - No Thermite on 9/11...

2010-03-02T20:53:00.001Z

I was invited to go on with Ralph Winterrowd last night to talk about the Thermite cover up. For those who have not yet been able to rid themselves of thermite, perhaps this may help (unless, of course, you are attached to thermite on 9/11 - in which case, who am I to tell you what to think... ;)

Andrew Johnson - No Thermite on 911 - The New 911 Cover Up - Ralph Winterrowd - 01 Mar 2010.mp3

Or Top link:

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/index.php?dir=911/&sort=date&order=desc

I only send it because of the re-energising of the thermite story, what with the Paul Craig Roberts article mentioning it, and this Architects and Engineers "initiative" (of intellectual herding).

Anyway, you can take it or leave it, for what it's worth!

You can also check out:

http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/

Which I have sent before, but some people on this list may not yet have seen it.

Some people say "It doesn't matter whether it was thermite or something else that destroyed the towers." Um - yes it does matter - for 2 reasons:

1) It will lead one, ultimately, to the perpetrators
2) The energy weaponry which was disclosed on 911 shows that we are slaves to the withholding of this technology and we have been scammed into using fossil fuels over the last 100 years or so.

Angle Cut Core Columns - Comes Up Again and Again...

2010-02-22T16:51:00.003Z

This image, or some version of it
e.g. It appears on page 23 of Eric Hufschmid's "Painful Questions" book and is indicated as "Unknown photo" - presumably of unknown origin.

But let's say, for the sake of argument, thermite cutter charges made the steel like that - does this really affect the conclusion about how most of the rest of towers turned to dust...?

Jim Marrs does the "Thermite Shuffle"

2009-12-28T16:11:00.001Z

On 27th December 2009, Jim Marrs appeared on the Dave Hodges show. Sheldon Day called in to the show to get Jim Marrs’ take on what destroyed the WTC and ask him whether he had studied the evidence for directed energy weapons.

Read More:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=265&Itemid=60

Richard Dolan and the National Thermitic State

2009-12-13T20:03:00.002Z

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=262&Itemid=60
Why does a noted UFO author ONLY talk about thermite? Clearly, he's not yet "thermite free" - despite being sent the evidence...

Footnote

The main proponent of thermite being involved in the destruction of the WTC is Steven E Jones. He described Dr Judy Wood's collection of evidence as being just about "ray beams from space". Therefore, consider this passage from Richard Dolan's latest work.
UFOs and the National Security State, Volume II, by Richard Dolan:
"UFOs were also receiving media attention of a different sort, in this case the tabloid publication, The National Enquirer. For some time the paper had been mixing its standard tabloid fare with UFO stories that reflected genuine investigation. On October 31, the Enquirersent a series of questions to the Air Force about the intrusion of alleged unidentified "helicopters" over Lorain AFB from late 1975. WY not the New York Times, Washington Post, CBS, or other mainstream news agencies? Why the Enquirer? Years later, journalist Terry Hansen interviewed Bob Pratt, the Enquirer's reporter on the story. Pratt acknowledged that the tipoff appeared to have been an anonymous phone caller, "possibly with the intention of discrediting the information." After searching his notes, Pratt found a type-written statement with the name of UFO researcher Brad Sparks on the bottom, stating that on May 17 1977, an anonymous caller had contacted the Enquirer about the overflights. Pratt had no recollection of this, nor of having worked with Sparks. What makes this more interesting is that the Enquirer publisher, Gene Pope, had been a CIA agent during the early 1950s. What he did there remains classified, except that he was involved in the Agency's Psychological Warfare Unit. Hansen's research suggested that the CIA helped to fund the Enquirer when Pope took it over, most likely to provide sensationalistic coverage to certain stories as needed - a kind of 'inoculation', just as a doctor gives a touch of disease to the patient to stimulate a reaction fom the immune system. Even soberly researched articles would be discredited within the confines of a tabloid dedicated to horoscopes and celebrity gossip."

Osama Bin Thermite and the Microspheres - World Tour

2009-11-08T13:09:00.004Z

I hope that, in this post, I can be forgiven for perhaps being a bit more frivolous than I would usually be (including the title of this post).

With the "Hard Evidence" Down Under mini tour, we almost seem to be seeing thermite turned into a Rock Opera - even the ticket prices are similar...

http://www.thehardevidence.com/site

Tickets: Adult $60/Concession $30 - Press and poor free on request

Perhaps people will look at the other evidence, then plead poverty - and save themselves from being fleeced.

So can we give a new name to this "Down Under" tour:

"Osama Bin Thermite and the Microspheres - The Hardly Evidence Tour"

Of course, this spoof title could only be appreciated by studying the evidence linked from this blog and "removing the packaging" - which is all this group seems to be concerned with (i.e. all packaging and no real substance). Think of them as a more "user friendly" version of the 9/11 Commission - both groups have at least one thing in common - they seem to be more concerned about convincing people of a certain story than holding anyone accountable for crimes or their cover up.

What I would truly like to see is Richard Gage, Steve Jones, Niels Harrit doing a rendition of the song below.

For more on this line, see http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/cc/thermite1.html and http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/cc/thermite2.html

Keep it real.

UK 911 Forum Censors Post about "Thermite Free" "mistake".

2009-11-07T23:29:00.003Z

I made the post below on the UK forum at about 9:30pm on the UK 911 forum.

Within about 1 hour, the thread I created had been moved to the "Bin" by one of the moderators.

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=141223#141223

I have created an archive of the thread here:

http://www.checktheevidence.com/Misc/911UKThreadonWoudbergThermiteFree.mht

I attempted to repost here:

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=141225#141225

Again we can see how much time can be wasted "playing games".

=============

Lee Woudberg recently posted a YouTube video
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmrB8VKUPw0[/youtube]
in response to my earlier video
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AGBTuFKxyc[/youtube]
I have to commend Lee on finding a mistake in my video in that Thermite IS (sort of) mentioned in Jones' RFC - the word is in a link to his paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?"
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Why%20Indeed%20Did%20the%20WTC%20Buildings%20Completely%20Collapse%20Jones%20Thermite%20World%20Trade%20Center%20J24.pdf
and I had indeed missed this (it wasn't a deliberate error on my part) . It goes to show that everyone should indeed, "check the evidence" to find errors. I provided links on the YouTube video to enable people to do just that.
Having said that, does this mean that Thermite destroyed the WTC? What does Lee Woudberg think? (I posted 2 or 3 comments on his video).
I have posted further thoughts on this blog, some of which are included below.
http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com/2009/11/thermite-paper-has-disclaimer-and-was.html
e.g. Thermite Paper has a disclaimer and was updated in Jan 2007. "The views in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author." Amazing. Does that imply that the co-submitters on the RFC DO NOT support Jones' connclusions?
So come on folks, what turned those cars upside down and levitated those people etc etc - what's YOUR explanation. Can Lee do us a video EXPLAINING WHAT DID IT? Thanks!
Again, thanks to Lee for checking the evidence and allowing me to find further points on interest in Jones' "paper".

Thermite Paper has a disclaimer and was updated in Jan 2007

2009-11-07T21:04:00.004Z

In checking out Lee Woudberg's points, I discovered that Jones' paper has a disclaimer in it!!

http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Why%20Indeed%20Did%20the%20WTC%20Buildings%20Completely%20Collapse%20Jones%20Thermite%20World%20Trade%20Center%20J24.pdf

"The views in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author."

Amazing. Does that imply that the co-submitters on the RFC DO NOT support Jones' connclusions?

Also, the paper is entitled: "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?"

Question: Did the towers completely collapse, or did they turn to dust?

Compare and Contrast - Thermite Grenade and WTC....

2009-11-07T17:58:00.004Z

Wow! This looks JUST LIKE what happened to the WTC! (not)

Think: Scale this up by a factor of - erm - several thousand times... would you get this? (Compare and Contrast...)

Well, I don't know about you - but... I wish I hadn't been fooled in 2005/2006...

The Thermte Free RFC - CORRECTION!

2009-11-07T16:56:00.003Z

I found out today I had made a small mistake!

In this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmrB8VKUPw0 Lee Woudberg checked the contents of my "Thermite Free" video and found by unchecking the "whole words" option in the Search, you can find a link to Steven E Jones paper!!

Well done Lee! You did the right thing! You checked what i said and found a mistake! Which is what you should do!

But I would say that it is still quite surprising that the words thermite and molten metal are not mentioned *separately* in the RFC. There are o pictures or diagrams of his thermite experiments - only that single link to his paper.

Also note, Lee Woudberg did not e-mail me to point out my error - he just posted the YouTube video first - but hey, that's the way the cookie crumbles folks!

=============
Hey man! Well done! You found an error in my analysis!
Thanks - I will correct my analysis in my video list!!
Tell me, though - how can thermite turn steel to dust!
Gosh - Andrew Johnson made a mistake! He MUST NOT BE BELIEVED!
He must be an idiot!
THANK YOU FOR SAVING US FROM ANDREW JOHNSON - that tosser!
================

So, is my credibility shot? Do you rely on me for your opinion?

9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007

2009-10-30T18:17:00.002Z

These videos call into question the nature of the Molten Metal which some people apparently witnessed around the time of 911.

9/11-The New Hiroshima-Pt 1 - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007

This presentation was given by Dr Judy Wood at the Madison 9/11 Conference (What's Controversial and What's Not) organised by Jim Fetzer on the weekend of Aug 3rd-5th, 2007. This is the 1st hour of Dr Wood's important presentation, which looks at the destruction of the WTC - and how it was most likely caused by a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-7892004186194307613

9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Part 2 - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007
This presentation was given by Dr Judy Wood at the Madison 9/11 Conference (What's Controversial and What's Not) organised by Jim Fetzer on the weekend of Aug 3rd-5th, 2007. This is the 2nd hour of Dr Wood's important presentation, which looks at the destruction of the WTC - and how it was most likely caused by a Directed Energy Weapon of some kind.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6714196008143117547

The "Thermite Free" RFC

2009-10-30T18:16:00.004Z

On March 16, 2007 NIST logged the receipt of a Request for Correction (RFC) to their WTC reports by Dr. Judy Wood. This RFC sets out the evidence of 1 or more Directed Energy Weapons being used to destroy most or all of the WTC Complex.

On April 12 2007, NIST logged the receipt of a Request for Correction (RFC) to their WTC reports by Dr. Dr Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, and Richard Gage. This video shows how you can search their documents for the word "Thermite" and "Molten" and you will find their original RFC does not mention Thermite or Molten Metal.

Their RFC appeal *does* mention Thermite, but NOT in the context of their research" and only as an arbitrary example of a hypothetical analogy.

There seems to be a global effort to convince people that Thermite played a significant role in the destruction of the WTC. If this was true, then why is this not stated, with evidence, in the RFC submitted to NIST?

The answer seems to be that the Thermite is an "alternative conspiracy theory" which has no real evidence to support it. The proponents probably did not put their research in the RFC because this in itself would have been fraud.

We are looking at documents which are over 2 years old, which shows how successful the operation to promote thermite has been.

You can access the documents on this page from these links:

NIST

http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PROD01_002619

Copies of "Jones et al" Documents:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/RFCtoNISTbyMcIlvaineDoyleJonesRyanGageSTJ.pdf

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/AppealLetterToNISTGourleyEtAl.pdf

Dr Judy Wood's original RFC

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NISTpdf/070316_Wood_NIST_RFC6.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Zp3wEm0R5k

Steve Jones "on Demand Video" - Part of the "Thermite Free" Initiative!

2009-10-28T22:27:00.003Z

Let the man speak for himself!!

Courtesy of Windows Movie Maker, Youtube and Blogger.

Questioning Steve Jones

Steve Jones and "The Next 9/11 Attack"

Steve Jones and "The WTC Spire"

Prof Steve Jones - "Trust in Me"

Thermite, WTC Dustification and Steve Jones

Steve Jones and Molten Aluminium

Are you "Thermite Free" Yet? If not, try the next post...

911 - Freeing Yourself From Thermite

2009-10-28T22:03:00.002Z

Here's a start:

Harrit, Jones et al Conclude Remains of WTC found in WTC Dust

2009-10-27T23:35:00.011Z

What important 9/11 evidence are Steve Jones and the Co-authors ignoring or unable to address?

This is a quickly composed article, posted as a response to the re-cycled and morphing thermite theory, which has again been “dressed up” in what appears to be an authentic Scientific Paper. As all 9/11 researchers should know, appearances can be deceptive. So, let’s scratch the veneer of apparent credibility and look at the evidence and issues Steve Jones and his cohorts won’t address.

Could Jones, Harrit et al have published this paper because too many people are finding out about the Hurricane (Erin) parked outside NYC on 9/11? Are they also realising the connection of the effects seen at the WTC to those of the Hutchison Effect:

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/

Exactly what is the Bentham Open Journal? It costs $800 to get a paper published on there:

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/MSandI.htm

Perhaps it is too much to expect or ask reviewers to look into the background of the evidence as a way of validating the paper.

http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/EBM.htm

Though the editor in chief is listed, no other details about reviewers on the editorial board are available – apart from their name and country. I.e. their qualifications and areas of specialism are not listed (at least not on this page).

Bentham has inconsistently applied peer review - even accepting at least one "Nonsense" paper:

http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/06/hoax-exposes-incompetence-or-worse-at.html

A further detailed critique of the Bentham Paper can be found starting here:

http://www.rushmessageboard.com/cpmb/index.php?showtopic=30089&view=findpost&p=1325301

When studied closely, there is no verifiable evidence that thermite played ANY SIGNIFICANT role in the destruction of the WTC. (It MAY have been used in cutting some of small amounts of remaining steel in the clean up operation). If it were truly significant, why didn’t Jones and his team submit his research in their legal challenges to NIST (see below).

2005 - Jones says "thermite carried in in loads"
2006/7 - Jones says "probably thermite AND superthermite"
2008 - Jones says "Paint on thermite"
2009 - Jones says "Active thermitic compounds"

So which one is correct? Or is this "morphing as we go" to string people along - and distract them from the verifiable evidence that thermite/superthermite/nanothermite/DOD thermite/superthermate can never explain - such as

The severe lack of debris:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=145&Itemid=60

Upside down cars at the WTC

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ1.html#lift

Straight-line hurricane movement

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/pics/erin2001_e.gif

Magnetic field disturbances at the PRECISE moment of "1st impact".

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html

1) Steven E Jones and a group of people submitted an RFC to NIST regarding the NCSTAR reports for WTC 1 & 2.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/RFCtoNISTbyMcIlvaineDoyleJonesRyanGageSTJ.pdf

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/AppealLetterToNISTGourleyEtAl.pdf

Why do these documents not mention Molten Metal anywhere in them? Why does it not mention Prof Jones OWN thermite tests - which are said to be "conclusive"?

2) On May 8 2008, Prof Steven E Jones suggests the towers could have been destroyed with the help of Paint on Thermite. Why?

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/911/SEJones/Paint%20on%20Thermate%20-%209-11%20Debate-Air%20America%20-%20R%20Greene%20-%20S%20Jones%2008%20May%202008.mp3

3) Can the authors comment on or explain inverted cars near the WTC on 9/11 and the exploding cars reported by witnesses such Patricia Ondrovich and the exploding Scott Packs (oxygen tanks) reported by some firefighters?

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ1.html#lift

4) Can the authors comment on the proximity of Hurricane Erin to NYC during the events of 9/11 (was he aware of its proximity and existence?

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/

5) Are the authors going to submit a Qui Tam fraud case against NIST's contractors as Professor's Morgan Reynolds and Professor Judy Wood have done (Dr Wood's case is currently under appeal)

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

What exactly IS Active Thermitic Material?

In fact, Harrit can't explain much at all. All he says is that "Thermitic Compounds" were discovered in WTC. So, what is thermite? Aluminium and Iron Oxide powder. What was the tower's exterior made of? Aluminium! What else was in the towers - lots of metal - and a lot of it was quite similar to Iron - i.e. Steel. And some of that will have been oxidised (i.e. Iron Oxide - rust). So what does his study prove? It simply proves that the things the tower was made of was found in the DUST (note, not "soldified blob of melted material")!

Now let’s have a look at some other things that Dr Steve Jones has suggested.

Steve Jones suggests 9/11 Truthers should irradiate themselves:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45&Itemid=60

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h71WsJMGdI8

30:05 -Jones: OK. One other exercise is that we have learned that with evidence we can learn a great deal so if there is an event and - we won’t even name a cit lets just say an American city - blamed on Iran, certainly there will be 9/11 truthers nearby and I hope they realize the importance of collecting a sample [right] whether that’s dust … [also radiation] right - having a radiation detector handy if you’ve got one – whether it’s Geiger - if you send me a sample I’d be glad to look at it and I’m sure you would too, Bill. So, if there is such an event the point – the reason I’m emphasizing this is because it’s a bit of a warning if there are perpetrators thinking about – such another 9/11 they’d better think twice because 9/11 truthers are out there – we’re watching. We will get samples – we know what to do – evidence-based studies – we can do very quickly and we can put an end to lies - on the next 9/11 if it [inaudible] … which I hope we’ll avoid… is what I’m trying to say…

Steve Jones Denies that 70 stories of WTC Steel Turned to Dust - it "Shook and Fell"

It's ALL about the Cover up of FREE ENERGY. But some people who were previously involved in the Cold Fusion cover up don't want you to realise that.

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/

Declaring this a Thermite Free Zone!

2009-10-27T23:35:00.010Z

You think welding materials turned the WTC to Dust? Please have a look at the evidence!

Please, feel free to declare your own Website or Blog

THERMITE FREE

in relation to 9/11.

Why not download the logo above (right click and "Save As").

http://www.checktheevidence.com/images/stories/ThermiteFreeZone.jpg

Add it to your website, or blog, or even in an e-mail signature! Add a link to this blog, or to http://www.drjudywood.com/ or http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Who knows, maybe we'll change the world!

Look! No Thermite on 911!

2009-10-27T22:59:00.002Z

Here are some questions that need to be answered - very urgently by Jones et al. Then we follow that with some statements of Steven E Jones, then we have more articles about his background and we analyse the role of Greg Jenkins in this "affair".
Why are so many people supporting a group which is seemingly unwilling or unable to submit their "best evidence" to due legal consideration?

Verifiable WTC Evidence to be Explained

by Steven E Jones, Richard Gage et al

http://drjudywood.com/wtc/

The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed "collapse."
They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.
The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage, if any.
The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends. There were reports that "The Gap" was looted.
The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.
The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.
The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was not significantly greater than background noise.
The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
The upper 90 percent, approximately, of the inside of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
One file cabinet with folder dividers survived.
No toilets survived or even recognizable portions of one.
Windows of nearby buildings had circular and other odd-shaped holes in them.
In addition to the odd window damage, the marble facade was completely missing from around WFC1 and WFC2 entry, with no other apparent structural damage.
Fuzzballs, evidence that the dust continued to break down and become finer and finer.
Truckloads of dirt were hauled in and hauled out of the WTC site, a pattern that continues to this day.
Fuming of the dirt pile. Fuming decreased when watered, contrary to fumes caused by fire or heat.
Fuzzyblobs, a hazy cloud that appeared to be around material being destroyed.
The Swiss-Cheese appearance of steel beams and glass.
Evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation, as demonstrated by the near-instant rusting of affected steel.
Weird fires. The appearance of fire, but without evidence of heating.
Lack of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. No evidence of burned bodies.
Columns were curled around a vertical axis like rolled-up carpets, where overloaded buckled beams should be bent around the horizontal axis.
Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side cars that appeared to be burning.
Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust, and into Vesey Street in front of WTC6, plus a cylindrical arc was cut into Bankers Trust.
All planes except top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes (120 seconds) after WTC 1 had been destroyed.
Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.
The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings.
More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during the clean-up process than from the destruction of more than a million tons of buildings above it.
Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged and destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix.
The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared.
For more than seven years, regions in the ground under where the main body of WTC4 stood have continued to fume.
The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the total mass of the buildings.
The WTC7 rubble pile was too small for the total mass of the building and consisted of a lot of mud.
Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by "unexplained" waves, a plane turning into a mid-air fireball, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions.
Eyewitness testimony of Scott-pak explosions in fire trucks and fire trucks exploding that were parked near the WTC.
There were many flipped cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex near trees with full foliage.
Magnetometer readings in Alaska recorded abrupt shifts in the earth's magnetic field with each of the events at the WTC on 9/11.
Hurricane Erin, located just off Long Island on 9/11/01, went virtually unreported in the days leading up to 9/11, including omission of this Hurricane on the morning weather map, even though that portion of the Atlantic Ocean was shown on the map.
Sillystring, the appearance of curious cork-screw trails.
Uncanny similarities with the Hutchison Effect, where the Hutchison Effect exhibits all of the same phenomena listed above.

* Is it possible that such a technology exist? Since invention of the microwave for cooking in 1945 and lasers in 1955*, commercial and military development of directed-energy technology has proceeded apace, so use of directed-energy technology is likely to exist -- and the data tells us it does exist.

Questions for Steve Jones, Richard Gage and their Supporters

http://www.blogger.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=209&Itemid=60

Is Richard Gage ignoring some of the most important 9/11 Evidence? How many of the items below will he discuss on his European Tour?

1) Steven E Jones and a group of people submitted an RFC to NIST regarding the NCSTAR reports for WTC 1 & 2.

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/RFCtoNISTbyMcIlvaineDoyleJonesRyanGageSTJ.pdf

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2007/AppealLetterToNISTGourleyEtAl.pdf

Why do these documents not mention Molten Metal anywhere in them? Why does it not mention Prof Jones OWN thermite tests - which are said to be "conclusive"?

2) On May 8 2008, Prof Steven E Jones suggests the towers could have been destroyed with the help of Paint on Thermite - is Richard Gage familiar with this form of Thermite, and what does he think of this idea?

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/911/SEJones/Paint%20on%20Thermate%20-%209-11%20Debate-Air%20America%20-%20R%20Greene%20-%20S%20Jones%2008%20May%202008.mp3

3) Can Richard Gage comment on or explain inverted cars near the WTC on 9/11 and the exploding cars reported by witnesses such Patricia Ondrovich and the exploding Scott Packs (oxygen tanks) reported by some firefighters?

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ1.html#lift

4) Can Richard Gage comment on the proximity of Hurricane Erin to NYC during the events of 9/11 (was he aware of its proximity and existence?

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/erin/

5) Is Richard Gage and/or his group going to submit a Qui Tam fraud case against NIST's contractors as Professor's Morgan Reynolds and Professor Judy Wood have done (Dr Wood's case is currently under appeal)

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Steve Jones suggests 9/11 Truthers should irradiate themselves:

http://www.blogger.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=45&Itemid=60

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h71WsJMGdI8

30:05 -Jones:
OK. One other exercise is that we have learned that with evidence we can learn a great deal so if there is an event and - we won’t even name a city[43] lets just say an American city - blamed on Iran, certainly there will be 9/11 truthers nearby and I hope they realize the importance of collecting a sample [right] whether that’s dust … [also radiation] right - having a radiation detector handy if you’ve got one – whether it’s Geiger - if you send me a sample I’d be glad to look at it and I’m sure you would too, Bill[44]. So, if there is such an event the point – the reason I’m emphasizing this is because it’s a bit of a warning if there are perpetrators thinking about – such another 9/11 they’d better think twice because 9/11 truthers are out there – we’re watching. We will get samples – we know what to do – evidence-based studies – we can do very quickly and we can put an end to lies - on the next 9/11 if it [inaudible] … which I hope we’ll avoid… is what I’m trying to say…

Steve Jones suggests that the WTC was taken down using "Paint on Thermite"

http://www.checktheevidence.com/audio/911/SEJones/Paint%20on%20Thermate%20-%209-11%20Debate-Air%20America%20-%20R%20Greene%20-%20S%20Jones%2008%20May%202008.mp3

Steve Jones Denies that 70 stories of WTC Steel Turned to Dust - it "Shook and Fell"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO9Iv_4ZfNI

Watch the video closely - who's right?

Steven Jones Suggests it's Safe to Dip Wet Fingers in Molten Metal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tou71StrOb0

Steve Jones Laughs when another 9/11 Scholar Loses their Job

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdzx85klMYk

Provides no evidence of ad hominems - and thinks aluminium is harder than steel and denies Newton's 3rd law is valid. "Thank goodness we DON'T have powerful spaced based weapons, Dr Jones!"

Also, how clever of Greg Jenkins to prove the towers are still there. If it took "5 times the energy output of the earth" to destroy the towers (turn them to dust) with DEW, then it will have taken a similar amount of energy by other methods - including thermite. Can Steve Jones do energy calculations showing how any quantity of thermite can yield this amount of energy. What amount of thermite would be required to turn the towers to dust?

Steve Jones Falsely Claims Molten Aluminium is "Silvery at All
Temperatures in Daylight Conditions"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOnkCYFGH9Y

Dr Greg Jenkins Ambushes Dr Judy Wood at Midnight and Posts an Interview without Permission

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=46&Itemid=60

Where is Greg Jenkins now? What 9/11 Research of His Own has he done? Has He Got A Website with new and updated research?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u7PC95XGEk

In the comments "RedlinedMeter" seems REALLY upset that people are asking these sorts of questions about Jenkins - neither of these people have an explanation as to why New Yorkers weren't warned about Hurricane Erin - if its presence was a coincidence, it was a still a risk, like Katrina was to New Orleans.

Steven Jones’ Contributions to Science, Humanity and the Planet (by CB Brooklyn)
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=95&Itemid=60
WTC Molten Metal: Fact or Fiction?
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=91&Itemid=60
Steve Jones' Role in the Schism in 9/11 Scholars (But in the end, Fetzer's no better...)
The New “9/11 Hijackers”?

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=28&Itemid=60

No Thermite on 911! REALLY!

Anatomy of a Thermite Brainwashing Operation?

T. Mark Hightower's Nanothermite Challenge

Richard Gage and the "Adhominitic Method"

Chemical Engineer - "Has nanothermite been oversold to the 9/11 Truth community?"

Richard Gage - Gauged - Again!!

Richard Gage Quizzed about the Abilities of Thermite

Steven E Thermite Jones and Cold Fusion

Video - Defusing Nanothermite: Integrity

911 Truth Forums - The Truth?

AE911 Truth Petition Signer - Additional Info

AE911 Truth Petition Signer - Deleted for Posting About DEW Research and Dr Judy Wood

"No Thermite Ahead!!"

Ralph Winterrowd seems to agree - No Thermite on 9/11...

Angle Cut Core Columns - Comes Up Again and Again...

Jim Marrs does the "Thermite Shuffle"

Richard Dolan and the National Thermitic State

Osama Bin Thermite and the Microspheres - World Tour

UK 911 Forum Censors Post about "Thermite Free" "mistake".

Thermite Paper has a disclaimer and was updated in Jan 2007

Compare and Contrast - Thermite Grenade and WTC....

The Thermte Free RFC - CORRECTION!

9/11 - The New Hiroshima - Dr Judy Wood, Madison, Aug 2007

The "Thermite Free" RFC

Steve Jones "on Demand Video" - Part of the "Thermite Free" Initiative!

911 - Freeing Yourself From Thermite

Harrit, Jones et al Conclude Remains of WTC found in WTC Dust

Declaring this a Thermite Free Zone!

Look! No Thermite on 911!

Verifiable WTC Evidence to be Explained

by Steven E Jones, Richard Gage et al

Questions for Steve Jones, Richard Gage and their Supporters

More Questions (unanswered) for Steven E Jones and His Supporters

Steve Jones suggests 9/11 Truthers should irradiate themselves:

Steve Jones suggests that the WTC was taken down using "Paint on Thermite"

Steve Jones Denies that 70 stories of WTC Steel Turned to Dust - it "Shook and Fell"

Steven Jones Suggests it's Safe to Dip Wet Fingers in Molten Metal

Steve Jones Laughs when another 9/11 Scholar Loses their Job

Steve Jones Falsely Claims Molten Aluminium is "Silvery at AllTemperatures in Daylight Conditions"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOnkCYFGH9Y

Steve Jones Falsely Claims Molten Aluminium is "Silvery at All
Temperatures in Daylight Conditions"